Deregulation as economic stimulus: Stupid solutions from stupid people
I love it when conservatives pick and choose which principles of Keynesian capitalism they wish to be validated by. I wish people were required to refresh their economics education at least as often as they are required to be tested to drive. Comparably speaking, bad drivers don’t seem nearly as dangerous as bad voters. Yes, I know many conservatives don’t subscribe to Keynes at all, but you cannot swing a sword if you aren’t prepared to get cut by a sword. Of course, most of the time, when you are debating economics with conservatives, you’re usually not discussing it with someone with enough of an understanding of economics to get into nuance. Usually, you’re just debating the echoes of Mitch McConnell’s Jedi-mind-trick talking points.
Small and large businesses create jobs, but small businesses also quickly close their doors unless there are people who can afford to buy the products. So unless you can inject fuel into our economy by opening 1,000,000 shops that sell products in a recessed/depressed economy (which you cannot do), you still need to stimulate the economy. In order to do that you need to give a lot of money to people who will spend it.
Now, conservatives will tell you that you should give that money to people who are already making a lot of it, and that they will invest the extra money into ventures that produce jobs. But who is going to buy the products these new businesses sell?
Is it other rich people? These people already have a lot of money. Why aren’t they spending enough to encourage other wealthy people to start these businesses now? Is it because they know that a depressed/recessed economy (when there are fewer people who can afford to buy products) is a terrible economy to try to sell things in? Gosh, if I were looking for a safe place to invest my money, I’d place a bet on that one.
Aggregate demand is down. The way you stimulate demand is by putting money in the hands of people who need to spend money immediately, not people who have a tremendous storehouse of money and for whom the greatest strain is reaching to the top of their pile. But then, maybe they’ll hire poor people to do it…
The economy began to shrink intensely in third quarter ’08. The largest reason it did so was, yes, because the house of cards that much of our available capital was resting on predictably collapsed. No capitol means no investment. But it wasn’t the only domino in line. There were several dominoes in advance of that one.
The strain that ultimately pushed the collapse over the brink was the massive stress placed on our economy by booming gas prices that were caused (so we’re told) by Wall Street speculation on oil prices. More and more people bought oil futures and gas prices shot up and exploited poor fuel economy in personal vehicles as well as shipping fleets. Shipping products to stores raised product prices and demand for high priced products shrank. People who were employed to manufacture those products that weren’t in demand were then unemployed. That unemployment further reduced demand. While all of this was happening, those same people who could only barely afford those sub-prime mortgages defaulted and… voila… economic shrinkage.
What could have steadied the oil futures market, so that the price couldn’t exceed the ability of the economy to sustain those prices? Regulation. The famous r-word.
The conservatives’ answer to putting out our fire is instead to add more fire. Steady our economy by removing regulation that impairs business from swinging wildly again. After all… when everything is burned down, there won’t be anything left to burn anymore. Fire gone.